Sistema de solución de controversias inversionista-estado (ISDS) en crisis: Estados Unidos y la Unión Europea

Resumen

Este artículo analiza las principales posturas respecto al sistema de solución de controversias inversionista-Estado o investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) en Esta dos Unidos y la Unión Europea. En un inicio se hace referencia a la discusión del TPP-11 en Chile, repasando las principales características del ISDS y las críticas que se han esbozado durante los últimos años. Posteriormente se procede a estudiar los ámbitos espaciales mencionados, identificando en cada uno de ellos su postura tradicional con respecto al sistema, las nuevas propuestas y, finalmente, los tratados de nueva generación que han suscrito

Referencias

Ansari, Salamah y Rajesh Babu (2018). «North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)». Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 29: 390-397. DOI: 10.1093/yiel/yvz032.

Appleton, Barry y Sean Stephenson (2016). Investment Treaty Working Group: Task Force Report on the Investment Court System Proposal. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3hNrkkh.

Baetens, Freya (2016). «The European Union’s proposed investment Court System: addressing criticisms of investor-state arbitration while raising new challenges». Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 43 (4): 367-384. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3rw2DMi.

Baker, John y Lindsey Keiser (2019). «NAFTA/USMCA Dispute Settlement Mechanisms and the Constitution». University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, 50 (1): 1-58. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3rF3tGH.

Bas, Magdalena (2015). «Solución de controversias en los tratados bilaterales de inversión: mapa de situación en América del Sur». Revista de la Secretaría del Tribunal Permanente de Revisión, 3 (5): 233-253. DOI: 10.16890/rstpr.a3.n5.233.

—.(2019). «Acuerdo Mercosur-Unión Europea: sombras y ausencia de la solución de controversias inversor-Estado». Documentos de trabajo (Fundación Carolina), 21. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3mTVz8x.

Begic, Taida (2016). «Investor-State Arbitration: Between Private and Public Interests». Manchester Journal of International Economic Law, 13 (3): 250-263. Disponible en https://bit.ly/2TwyUGw.

Borchardt, Klaus-Dieter (2011). El ABC del Derecho de la Unión Europea. Luxemburgo: Oficina de Publicaciones de la Unión Europea.

Brower, Charles y Jawad Ahmad (2018). «Why the Demolition Derby That Seeks to Destroy Investor-State Arbitration». Southern California Law Review, 91 (6): 1139- 1196. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3eSJXkM.

Brower, Charles y Sadie Blanchard (2014). «What’s in a Meme? the truth about Investor-State Arbitration: why it need not, and must not, be repossessed by States». Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 52 (3): 689-777. Disponible en https://bit.ly/2Tz70tD.

Bungenberg, Marc y August Reinisch (2019). From bilateral arbitral tribunals and Investment Courts to a Multilateral Investment Court: options regarding the Institutionalization of Investor-State Dispute Settlement. Berlín: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-59732-3.

CIADI, Centro Internacional de Arreglo de Diferencias relativas a Inversiones (2020). Carga de casos del CIADI-estadísticas. Washington D.C.: CIADI. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3BMO2B9.

Chaisse, Julien (2020). «Both possible and improbable - could COVID-19 measures give rise to Investor-State Disputes?». Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, 13 (1): 99-184. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3zoCwd4.

Charris, Juan (2019). «The proposed Investment Court System: does it really solve the problems». Revista Derecho del Estado, 42: 83-115. DOI: 10.18601/01229893.n42.04.

Clodfelter, Mark (2013). «The future direction of investment agreements in the European Union». Santa Clara Journal of International Law, 12 (1): 159-182. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3y2IDUc.

Comisión Europea (2015). Investment in TTIP and beyond – the path for reform enhancing the right to regulate and moving from current ad hoc arbitration towards an Investment Court, concept paper. Bruselas: Comisión Europea. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3iHaNgZ.

Consejo de la Unión Europea (2018). Proyecto de Conclusiones del Consejo sobre la negociación y la celebración de acuerdos comerciales de la UE–Adopción, 8622/18. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3wP5Bwo.

Cutler, Claire (2018). «The judicialization of private transnational power and authority». Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 25 (1): 61-96. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3eTojwW.

Esplugues, Carlos (2020). «Adiós a la libre circulación de inversiones... ¿sólo en tiempos de coronavirus?». Actualidad Jurídica Iberoamericana, 12 (2): 614-623. Disponible en https://bit.ly/2TxxdbU.

Puccio, Laura y Roderick Harte (2017). From arbitration to the Investment Court System (ICS): The evolution of CETA rules. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3B9ALSC.

Fach, Katia (2017). «Unión Europea e inversiones Internacionales: El futuro de los mecanismos de resolución de controversias Inversor-Estado». Revista Española de Derecho Internacional, 69 (1): 295-302. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3BBx0pi.

Faunce, Thomas (2015). «Australia’s embrace of investor-state dispute settlement: a challenge to the social contract ideal?». Australian Journal of International Affairs, 69 (5): 595-609. DOI: 10.1080/10357718.2015.1048781.

Franck, Susan (2019). «Between myth and reality: the 9th John E.C. Brierly Memorial Lecture». McGill Journal of Dispute Resolution, 5 (1): 1-29. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3kU7lT0.

Gallegos, Jaime (2019). «Algunos cambios que incorpora el T–MEC, en materia de inversiones extranjeras, en relación con lo previsto en el capítulo XI del TLCAN». Arbitraje, 12 (1): 167-179. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3zyZGO0.

Gantz, David (2016). «Introduction to U.S. Free Trade Agreements». British Journal of American Legal Studies, 5 (2): 299-314. DOI: 10.1515/bjals-2016-0010.

Giorgetti, Chiara, Laura Létourneau-Tremblay, Daniel Behn y Malcom Langford (2020). «Reforming international investment arbitration: an Introduction». The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, 18 (3): 303-313. DOI: 10.1163/15718034-12341406.

Grenness, Esther-Jane (2018). «Let’s Have a Souffle Instead: Selective Reform of the Investor-State Dispute Settlement Regime». University of Baltimore Journal of International Law, 6 (1): 138-169. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3zvEqIT.

Heppner, Sonja (2016). «A critical appraisal of the investment court system proposed by the European Commission». Irish Journal of European Law, 19 (5): 38-63. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3kQLQCi.

Hinderlang, Steffen (2014). Study on Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) and Alternatives of Dispute Resolution in International Investment Law, vol. 2. Bruselas: Parlamento Europeo. Disponible en https://bit.ly/36MLjZU.

Hinojosa, Luis (2015). «El alcance de la competencia exterior europea en materia de inversiones». Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo, 52: 871-907. DOI: 10.18042/cepc/rdce.52.02.

Jennings, Mark (2016). «The International Investment Regime and Investor-State Dispute Settlement: States Bear the Primary Responsibility for Legitimacy». Business Law International, 17 (2): 127-152. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3x13O7O.

Johnson, Lise (2012). «The 2012 US model bit and what the changes (or lack thereof) suggest about future investment treaties». Political Insurance Risk Newsletter, 8 (2): 1-5. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3y3uIxd.

Johnson, Lise y Oleksandr Volkov (2014). «State Liability for Regulatory Change: How International Investment Rules are Overriding Domestic Law». Investment Treaty News, 5 (1): 3-6. Disponible en https://bit.ly/36YpO8F.

Johnson, Lise, Lisa Sachs, Brooke Güven, y Jesse Coleman (2018). «Costs and benefits of investment treaties practical considerations for states Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment». DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3277965.

Kizer, Karen y Jeremy Sharpe (2015) «Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement: The U.S. experience». En Jean E. Kalicki y Anna Joubin-Bret (editoras), Reshaping the Investor-State Dispute Settlement System: Journeys for the 21st Century (pp. 172-182). Leiden: Brill Nijhoff. DOI: 10.1163/9789004291102_008.

Langford, Malcolm y Daniel Behn (2018). «Managing Backlash: The Evolving Investment Treaty Arbitrator?». European Journal of International Law, 29 (2): 551- 580. DOI: 10.1093/ejil/chy030.

Langford, Malcolm, Daniel Behn y Runar Hilleren (2017). «The Revolving Door in International Investment Arbitration». Journal of International Economic Law, 20 (2): 301-322. DOI: 10.1093/jiel/jgx018.

Lenk, Hannes (2016). «An investment court system for the new generation of EU trade and investment agreements: A discussion of the Free Trade Agreement with Vietnam and the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement with Canada». European Papers, 1 (2): 665-677. DOI: 10.15166/2499-8249/64.

Lester, Simon, Inu Manak y Kyounghwa Kim (2019). «Trump’s first trade deal: the slightly revised Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement». Cato Institute Free Trade Bulletin, 73: 1-6. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3zAA9Un.

Libertad y Desarrollo (2021). TPP-11: el acuerdo de libre comercio pendiente. Santiago: Libertad y Desarrollo. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3iJD7PJ.

Luque, María (2014). «Current Approaches to the International Investment Regime in South America». En Christoph Herrmann, Markus Krajewski y Jörg P. Terhechte (editores), European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2014 (pp. 285- 308). Berlín: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40913-4_12.

Muchlinski, Peter (2009). «The Framework of Investment Protection: the content of BITs». En Karl P. Sauvant y Lisa E. Sachs (editores), The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties, and Investment Flows (pp. 37-72). Nueva York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/ acprof:oso/9780195388534.003.0002.

OCDE (2012). Investor-State Dispute Settlement Public Consultation: 16 May–23 July 2012. París: OCDE. Disponible en https://bit.ly/2UHQaJq.

Pantaleo, Luca (2019). The Participation of the EU in International Dispute Settlement: Lessons from EU Investment Agreements. La Haya: T.M.C. Asser Press. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6265-270-5.

Polanco, Rodrigo (2017). «The chilean experience in South-South investment and trade agreements». En Fabio Morosini y Michelle Sánchez (editores), Reconceptualizing International Investment Law from the Global South (pp. 95-144). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781316996812.004.

Polanco, Rodrigo y Ramón Torrent (2016). Analysis of the prospects for updating the trade pillar of the European Union-Chile Association Agreement. Bruselas: Parlamento Europeo. DOI: 10.2861/46519.

Polonskaya, Ksenia (2018). «Diversity in the investor-state arbitration: Intersectionality must be a part of the conversation». Melbourne Journal of International Law, 19 (1): 259-298. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3x9i5zq.

Posadas, Alejandro y Gustavo Vega (2005). «El capítulo 11 del TLCAN: protección a la inversión extranjera». En Jorge Witker (coordinador), El Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte. Evaluación jurídica: diez años después (pp. 125-158). Ciudad de México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3iO5lsR.

Puig, Sergio (2019). «The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement: a glimpse into the geoeconomic world order». American Journal of International Law Unbound, 113: 56-60. DOI: 10.1017/aju.2019.6.

Reinisch, August y Lukas Stifter (2015). «European investment policy and ISDS». ELTE Law Journal, 1: 11-26. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3kRNjs5.

Rodríguez, Sonia (2010). «El CIADI frente a Argentina, México, Ecuador y Bolivia. Una actualización». En Sonia Rodríguez y Herfried Wöss (coordinadores), Arbitraje en materia de inversiones (pp. 191-276). Ciudad de México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Disponible en https://bit.ly/372sEJT.

Saha, Himaloya (2016). «A Critical Analysis of the Commonly Recommended Reforms of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS)». Legal Issues Journal, 4 (1): 39-54. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3kQEWNo.

Salacuse, Jeswald y Nicholas P. Sullivan (2009). «Do BITs really work?: an evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and their Grand Bargain». En Karl P. Sauvant y Lisa E. Sachs (editores), The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties, and Investment Flows (pp. 109-170). Nueva York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388534.003.0005.

Sand, Philippe (2011). «Conflict and conflicts in investment treaty arbitration: ethical standards for counsel». En Chester Brown y Kate Miles (editores), Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration (pp. 19-41) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139043809.007.

Schreuer, Christoph (2014). «Investment Arbitration». En Cesare R. Romano, Karen J. Alter y Yuval Shany (editores), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (pp. 295-315). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/law/9780199660681.003.0014.

Schwieder, Robert (2016). «TTIP and the Investment Court System: a new (and improved?) paradigm for Investor-State adjudication». Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 55 (1): 178-227. Disponible en https://bit.ly/2WiBHnV.

Sornarajah, Muthucumaraswamy (2010). The International Law on Foreign Investment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

—. (2016). «An International Investment Court: panacea or purgatory?». Columbia FDI Perspectives, 180. DOI: 10.7916/D8RN389W.

Swan, Alan (2000). «Ethyl Corporation v. Canada, Award on Jurisdiction (under NAFTA/UNCITRAL)». American Journal of International Law, 94 (1): 159-166. DOI: 10.2307/2555239.

Tams, Christian (2014). «Procedural aspects of Investor-State Dispute Settlement: the emergency of a european approach». Journal of World Investment & Trade, 15 (3/4): 595-611. Disponible en https://bit.ly/36XLGAX.

Taton, Xavier y Guillaume Croisant (2019). «Judicial protection of investors in the European Union: the remedies offered by investment arbitration, the European Convention on Human Rights and EU law». Indian Journal of Arbitration Law, 7 (2): 61-145. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3BNdPsS.

Tienhaara, Kyla (2018). «Regulatory chill in a warming world: the threat to climate policy posed by Investor-State Dispute Settlement». Transnational Environmental Law, 7 (2): 229-250. DOI: 10.1017/S2047102517000309.

Vandevelde, Kenneth (2009a). «A brief history of international investment agreements». En Karl P. Sauvant y Lisa E. Sachs (editores), The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties, and Investment Flows (pp. 3-36). Nueva York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388534.003.0001.

—. (2009b). «A Comparison of the 2004 and 1994 U.S. Model BITs: Rebalancing Investor and Host Country Interests». En Karl P. Sauvant (editor), Yearbook on international investment law & policy 2008–2009 (pp. 282-316). Nueva York: Oxford University Press. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3eSdQSa.

Van Duzer, Anthony (1997). «Investor-State Dispute Settlement under NAFTA Chapter 11: the shape of things to come». Canadian Yearbook of International Law, 35: 263-290. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3hZMyLR.

Vega, Gustavo y Gilbert Winham (2002). «The Role of NAFTA dispute settlement in the management of Canadian, Mexican and U.S. Trade and investment relations». Ohio Northern University Law Review, 28 (3): 651-706. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3iNZGD7.

Velarde, Luis y Amir Farhadi (2017). «Lessons from the deathbed of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP): are recent critiques of the Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) system warranted». Dispute Resolution International, 11 (1): 3-22. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3zrF7CW.

Webb, Jason (2009). «Toward a minimalist system of International Investment Law». Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 32 (2): 303-350. Disponible en https://bit.ly/36Ws7cr.

—. (2018). «Do we really need Bits? Toward a return to contract in International Investment Law». Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy, 3 (1): 121-146. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3kS02ez.

Wolkewitz, Mathias (2016). «Transparency and Independence of Arbitrators in Investment Arbitration: Rule of Law Implications». European Investment Law and Arbitration Review. DOI: 10.1163/24689017-00101015.

Yotova, Rumiana (2018). «Opinion 2/15 of the CJEU: Delineating the scope of the new EU competence in foreign direct investment». The Cambridge Law Journal, 77 (1): 29-32. DOI: 10.1017/S000819731800020X.

Zuleta, Eduardo (2015). «The challenges of creating a standing International Investment Court» En Jean E. Kalicki y Anna Joubin-Bret (editores), Reshaping the Investor-State Dispute Settlement System: Journeys for the 21st Century (pp. 403- 423). Leiden: Brill Nijhoff. DOI: 10.1163/9789004291102_017.
Palabras clave Arbitraje de diferencias inversionista Estado, TPP11, Estados Unidos, Unión Europea, Sistema de Corte de Inversiones
Compartir
Cómo citar
Urzúa Farías, A. (2021). Sistema de solución de controversias inversionista-estado (ISDS) en crisis: Estados Unidos y la Unión Europea. Revista de Derecho Económico, 78(1), 93-117. doi:10.5354/0719-7462.2021.64493
Sección
Artículos
Publicado
2021-07-31